From: William Loughborough
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0124.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0129.html
From: Stefan Kokkelink
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0161.html
From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: RE: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0016.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0018.html
From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0020.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0021.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0022.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0023.html
From: Stefan Kokkelink
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0024.html
From: Sergey Melnik
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0029.html
From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: One issue and a brief Re on "A Logical Interpretation of RDF"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0036.html
From: "Tim Berners-Lee"
Subject: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0107.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0110.html
From: Tim Berners-Lee
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0117.html
From: Tim Berners-Lee
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0118.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0119.html
From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re:
RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0132.html
From: Guha
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0140.html
From: Natalya Fridman Noy
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0142.html
From: Guha
Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS
bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0143.html
From: Bill dehOra
Subject: RE: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re : RDFS
bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0145.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0146.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0147.html
From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0148.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0149.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0150.html
From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0154.html
From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: RE: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0158.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0164.html
From: Natalya Fridman Noy
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0166.html
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0175.html
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0176.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0177.html
From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0179.html
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0181.html
From: Natalya Fridman Noy
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was:
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0184.html
Related Discussions
From: Graham Klyne
RDF and contexts -- discussion paper
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0028.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0063.html
From: Jonathan Borden
Subject: Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0079.html
Subject: Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0104.html
Subject: Re: overloading of "model" Was: off the top issues list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0106.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0115.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: ANNOUNCE: new mailing list, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0116.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0121.html
From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0122.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0124.html
From: Jan Grant
Subject: Now I no longer know what my opinion is :-( Was RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0125.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0127.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0161.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0165.html
From: Jan Grant
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0168.html
From: "Greg FitzPatrick"
Subject: SV: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0170.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: SV: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0171.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: SV: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0172.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0173.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: Is the reification of a resource unique.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0174.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0178.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0180.html
From: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Subject: What could be the drawback of an intermediate reified RDF sy
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0187.html
From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0192.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0196.html
From: Seth Russell
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0197.html
From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0198.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0200.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0202.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0203.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0206.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0207.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0208.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0209.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0210.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re[1] abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0211.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0212.html
From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0001.html
From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0003.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0008.html
From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0009.html
From: Ian Horrocks
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0010.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0011.html
From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both
supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0012.html
From: Ian Horrocks
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0014.html
From: Tim Serong
Subject: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0019.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0021.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0022.html
From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0023.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: rdf:about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0024.html
From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both
supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0025.html
From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: RDF and logic
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0026.html
From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0027.html
From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0028.html
From: "Jonathan Borden"
Subject: Re: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0029.html
From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: RDF and logic
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0030.html
From: Tim Serong
Subject: RE: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0033.html
From: "Arnold deVos"
Subject: Re: about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0035.html
From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0098.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0099.html
From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0100.html
From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0102.html
From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0103.html
From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0104.html
From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0105.html
From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0106.html