Analysis of the discussions about the logical interpretation of RDF

which is presented in the paper:
A Logical Interpretation of RDF
Thu Oct 12 2000


Direct Answers and Discussions
Related Discussions

Direct Answers and Discussions

From: Reinhold Klapsing
Subject: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0122.html

From: William Loughborough
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0124.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0129.html

From: Stefan Kokkelink
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0161.html

From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: RE: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0016.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0018.html

From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0020.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0021.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0022.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0023.html

From: Stefan Kokkelink
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0024.html

From: Sergey Melnik
Subject: Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0029.html

From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: One issue and a brief Re on "A Logical Interpretation of RDF"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0036.html

From: "Tim Berners-Lee"
Subject: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0107.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0110.html

From: Tim Berners-Lee
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0117.html

From: Tim Berners-Lee
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0118.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0119.html

From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0132.html

From: Guha
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0140.html

From: Natalya Fridman Noy
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0142.html

From: Guha
Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0143.html

From: Bill dehOra
Subject: RE: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re : RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0145.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0146.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0147.html

From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0148.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0149.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0150.html

From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0154.html

From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: RE: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0158.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0164.html

From: Natalya Fridman Noy
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0166.html

From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0175.html

From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0176.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0177.html

From: "Lee Jonas"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0179.html

From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider"
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0181.html

From: Natalya Fridman Noy
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property")
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0184.html

Related Discussions

From: Graham Klyne
RDF and contexts -- discussion paper
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0028.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0063.html

From: Jonathan Borden
Subject: Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0079.html

Subject: Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0104.html

Subject: Re: overloading of "model" Was: off the top issues list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0106.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0115.html

From: Dan Brickley Subject: ANNOUNCE: new mailing list, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0116.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0121.html

From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0122.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0124.html

From: Jan Grant
Subject: Now I no longer know what my opinion is :-( Was RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0125.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0127.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0161.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0165.html

From: Jan Grant
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0168.html

From: "Greg FitzPatrick"
Subject: SV: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0170.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: SV: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0171.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: SV: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0172.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0173.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: Is the reification of a resource unique.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0174.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0178.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0180.html

From: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Subject: What could be the drawback of an intermediate reified RDF sy
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0187.html

From: Dan Brickley
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0192.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0196.html

From: Seth Russell
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0197.html

From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0198.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0200.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0202.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0203.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0206.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0207.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0208.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0209.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: RE: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0210.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re[1] abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0211.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: abstract model and reification
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0212.html

From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0001.html

From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0003.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0008.html

From: Jan Grant
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0009.html

From: Ian Horrocks
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0010.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0011.html

From: Wolfram Conen
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both
supportable http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0012.html

From: Ian Horrocks
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0014.html

From: Tim Serong
Subject: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0019.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0021.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0022.html

From: McBride, Brian
Subject: RE: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0023.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: rdf:about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0024.html

From: Graham Klyne
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0025.html

From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: RDF and logic
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0026.html

From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0027.html

From: "McBride, Brian"
Subject: RE: about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0028.html

From: "Jonathan Borden"
Subject: Re: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0029.html

From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: RDF and logic
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0030.html

From: Tim Serong
Subject: RE: Assumptions about anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0033.html

From: "Arnold deVos"
Subject: Re: about, rdf:ID and anonymous resources
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0035.html

From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0098.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0099.html

From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0100.html

From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0102.html

From: Tom Van Eetvelde
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0103.html

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0104.html

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0105.html

From: Jeen Broekstra
Subject: Re: definition of domain
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Oct/0106.html


For Further discussion on logic and rdf see the www-rdf-logic and the www-rdf-interest mailinglists

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/

Reinhold Klapsing